North Dakota Court rules that doctors can refuse gender-affirmation care for religious reasons
Sign up for more LGBTQ+ news and updates at TrueQueer.
In a recent ruling by a North Dakota federal judge, it was determined that religious doctors are not obligated to perform gender-affirmation surgeries, potentially creating another obstacle for transgender and non-binary individuals seeking essential healthcare. The decision, which has sparked controversy and concern within the LGBTQ+ community, stems from a lawsuit filed by the Christian Employers Alliance (CEA) against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2021.
The lawsuit challenged two mandates imposed by the EEOC, which required religious employers to provide health insurance covering gender-affirming treatment for their employees and mandated religious doctors to perform life-saving gender-affirmation surgeries. Failure to comply with these mandates could result in charges of gender identity discrimination. The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) represented CEA in arguing that these mandates infringed upon the religious beliefs of employers and doctors by compelling them to endorse gender-affirmation treatment even if they objected.
On 4 March, the District Court of North Dakota ruled in favor of CEA, citing concerns that the mandates would violate the religious beliefs of employers and doctors. This ruling has raised alarms among advocates for LGBTQ+ rights, particularly in light of recent legislative actions in North Dakota that have targeted the community. In 2023, the state senate passed a record number of anti-LGBTQ+ bills, including bans on transgender students participating in sports teams aligned with their gender identity, restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare for youth, and prohibitions on public drag performances.
One particularly troubling bill proposed removing trans individuals from state data collection, further marginalizing and erasing the experiences of transgender individuals. The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) noted that the passage of these bills represented the most significant amount of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation advanced in a single day. State senator Ryan Braunberger, a Democrat and openly gay man, spoke out against these discriminatory measures during a passionate senate speech, revealing his own struggles with mental health and self-harm as a young person.
Braunberger emphasized the harmful impact these bills could have on LGBTQ+ youth, stating that they would feel increasingly isolated and unsupported in a state where legislation actively targets their identities. The judge’s recent ruling in the case of gender-affirmation surgeries further compounds these concerns, as it may limit access to critical healthcare services for transgender and non-binary individuals in North Dakota. As advocates continue to push for inclusivity and equal treatment for all members of the LGBTQ+ community, the fight for equitable healthcare access remains an ongoing battle in states like North Dakota.
In conclusion, the recent ruling by a North Dakota federal judge allowing religious doctors to refuse gender-affirmation surgeries underscores the challenges faced by transgender and non-binary individuals seeking essential healthcare. This decision, coupled with a wave of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in the state, highlights the ongoing struggle for inclusivity and equal rights for all members of the LGBTQ+ community. As advocates and lawmakers navigate these complex issues, the need for comprehensive and affirming healthcare services for transgender individuals remains a pressing concern in North Dakota and beyond.
Follow us on: Facebook for more LGBTQ+ news and updates at TrueQueer.
North Dakota
